The Internet's New 'Red Light District'

There's a new home for 'adult content' on the web--but it's not clear that it will offer any protection from online porn.

Share This Story

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) recently approved the creation of a new "neighborhood" on the Web.  And it's one you'll want to keep your kids out of.

ICANN is the governing body for the assignment of Internet domains. On June 25, ICANN's board approved the creation of a new "top-level domain" for the Internet designated specifically for pornographic content. The goal is to create an area on the Internet that can easily be blocked off from access by security software or web filtering software, preventing it from being reached accidentally or otherwise by people who shouldn't see it (like children, or people at work).

Top-level domains are what comes after the "." in a domain name—this site, for example, is part of the ".com" top-level domain, for commercial sites.  The new top-level domain, ".xxx", would be reserved specifically for sexually themed content,  neatly partitioning off anything unsavory from the rest of the Web. Starting in 2011, adult website owners could start moving their sites over to the .xxx "voluntary, self-regulating community".  

Parents and employers, in theory, would be able to easily block all domains with that extension from home and work computers. But in practice, it won't be that easy, because (1) the move is voluntary for adult websites, (2) they aren't wild about moving, and (3) they won't have to give up their .com or other domains when they move—meaning they could simply register .xxx domains and point them at their existing .com sites.  In other words, it could essentially double the amount of porn on the Internet.

"The way in which ICANN has chosen to implement the .xxx domain will have no effect whatsoever in terms of filtering adult content on the Internet," said Aaron Kenny, the co-founder of site-screening software vendor InternetSafety.com. "As long as there are still porn sites with .com extensions, you will still need to filter them one by one. Instead of solving the problem, ICANN has exacerbated it by paving the way for the porn industry to double their online footprint."

So, in other words, ICANN will actually hurt, more than help, parents in their efforts to protect their kids from exposure to inappropriate web content.  Software providers will still have to do site-by-site filtering—which often blocks legitimate web sites. 

Comments

Sign in or register to label comments with your username. Please note it could take up to 15 minutes for your comment to appear.
CAPTCHA
This tests that you are really a person and not a computer.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Anonymous | Oct 17, 2010

"So, in other words, ICANN will actually hurt, more than help, parents in their efforts to protect their kids from exposure to inappropriate web content.  Software providers will still have to do site-by-site filtering—which often blocks legitimate web sites" -  Sean Gallagher

What editor let that conjecture into the article?  Sure, if parents already have filtering software they will have to add .xxx sites to it.  But you should probably be able to do that globally, not on a site by site basis.  And as for the anti-porn wonks assertation that the porn industry will "double their online footprint" it's a false arguement.  The .xxx sites, by definition are for adult-themed websites.  You can't require sites to move their domain names.  Unless you are willing to pay for their losses.  And who's to say what "adult" is, anyway?  Plenty of movies get released with a NR rating, should their websites be .xxx? Should HBO for carrying NR/adult content such as Bill Maher's show and the Sopranos?  This was a totally opinionated piece of one-sided drivel that USA Today linked to on 10/17/10.

 

Thx,

 

Jay!

Anonymous | Jul 7, 2010
It's about time...I am sick of getting "those" emails in my Yahoo mail. I don't have one and I don't want it enlarged.

Tech Goes Strong Tools

  • Find out what that phrase really means!

    Slang Blaster

follow us

Advertisement

Slang Blaster

jk

Just kidding

No, she never said that I'm jk with you.

Blast Randomizer

Highest Rated

Men: Is It Too Late To Save Your Hair?
Article
Hair loss in men is apprently not...
"Soul Train" Creator Don Cornelius Dead at 75
Article
Woke up this morning to the sad...
Why I Won't Boycott Apple
Article
 Some people's opinions about...
Janet Jackson in brwn bra; Jennifer Lopez in nude shoes?
Article
Bras are in the news. Why? It's...
Advertisement


Part of NBCU iVillage Digital Lifestyle Network   |   © NBC Universal Inc. All rights reserved.